Raleighpedia:Style guide: Difference between revisions
FrankMuraca (talk | contribs) Creation of Style Guide page |
FrankMuraca (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While Raleighpedia is designed to be a community resource, the content on the site should conform to a shared style. Unless otherwise specified below, use [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style Wikipedia's style guide.] | |||
Raleighpedia | |||
==Citations== | |||
=== Repeated references === | |||
=== | |||
Raleighpedia favors clear, consistent citations over dense or repetitive footnoting. | Raleighpedia favors clear, consistent citations over dense or repetitive footnoting. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 9: | ||
Example: | Example: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
<ref name=" | <ref name="Meeting Minutes">...</ref> | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Subsequent uses: | Subsequent uses: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
<ref name=" | <ref name="Meeting Minutes" /> | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 29: | ||
Editors should not create ad hoc citation formatting within articles. If an existing template does not fit a new source type, the preferred approach is to create or extend a template rather than formatting citations manually. | Editors should not create ad hoc citation formatting within articles. If an existing template does not fit a new source type, the preferred approach is to create or extend a template rather than formatting citations manually. | ||
== Naming conventions and capitalization == | |||
==== City vs. city ==== | ==== City vs. city ==== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 35: | ||
Example: | Example: | ||
* “The City | * “The City adopted the policy in 2015.” | ||
Use '''“the city”''' (lowercase) when referring to Raleigh as a geographic place or community. | Use '''“the city”''' (lowercase) when referring to Raleigh as a geographic place or community. | ||
| Line 87: | Line 68: | ||
Avoid relative phrasing such as “recently,” “at the time,” or “in the past.” | Avoid relative phrasing such as “recently,” “at the time,” or “in the past.” | ||
== Tone and interpretation == | |||
Raleighpedia articles should be descriptive rather than interpretive. Articles should document what occurred, when it occurred, and what decisions were made, using the language of the record wherever possible. | Raleighpedia articles should be descriptive rather than interpretive. Articles should document what occurred, when it occurred, and what decisions were made, using the language of the record wherever possible. | ||
Avoid verbs or phrases that imply judgment or narrative framing, such as “marked a turning point,” “signaled a shift,” or “set the stage,” unless such language is explicitly used in a cited source. | Avoid verbs or phrases that imply judgment or narrative framing, such as “marked a turning point,” “signaled a shift,” or “set the stage,” unless such language is explicitly used in a cited source. | ||
== Use of AI, citations, and naming conventions == | |||
=== Use of AI-assisted writing === | |||
Raleighpedia does not prohibit the use of AI tools to assist with research, drafting, or formatting. However, AI tools should be treated as writing assistants, not as sources or authors. | |||
All content published on Raleighpedia is expected to meet the same standards regardless of how it was drafted. Content must be factually accurate, verifiable using reliable sources, neutral in tone, and grounded in documented records. | |||
Editors are responsible for reviewing, editing, and verifying any AI-assisted text before publication. Unedited or lightly edited AI output should not be pasted directly into articles. | |||
Editors may find Wikipedia’s guidance useful when evaluating AI-generated prose, particularly [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing|Signs of AI writing]]. Common issues include overly generic phrasing, vague summaries not tied to specific documents, fabricated or imprecise citations, and excessive repetition without documentary grounding. | |||
Appropriate uses of AI tools include: | |||
* summarizing long documents after they have been reviewed by the editor; | |||
* drafting neutral descriptive prose from meeting minutes, reports, or memoranda; | |||
* assisting with formatting tables, timelines, or citations; and | |||
* checking consistency of names, dates, or terminology across an article. | |||
AI tools should not be relied upon to: | |||
* invent narrative structure not supported by sources; | |||
* infer intent or motivation beyond what is stated in the record; or | |||
* generate citations that have not been independently verified by the editor. | |||